ABSTRACT
This study explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the academic quality of a foundation in engineering programme. A course experience questionnaire (CEQ) was administered before and during the pandemic to evaluate the six dimensions of academic quality assessment, workload, teaching, academic environment, standards, and skills development. A total of 234 students participated in the study, and the findings revealed that course satisfaction decreased during the pandemic. Many students were not satisfied with the teaching quality and skills development of the emergency online learning. On the contrary, students rated online assessment (during COVID-19) positively for being more appropriate in testing higher order thinking skills. The study suggested that online classes lack formal and informal social interactions to enhance various facets of skills development. Given the limitations of emergency online learning, the future of education might include moving towards blended learning. © 2022 IGI Global. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This conceptual paper aims to explore portfolio replication to resolve post-COVID pandemic private and public debt. This paper stresses the need to be less dependent on a debt-based system and the emergence Islamic equity market. Design/methodology/approach: This study analyses different types of risks involved in Islamic and conventional portfolios by using risk measures such as relative beta and comparatively examining the systematic and downside risk exposure of Islamic and conventional portfolios. Data was collected monthly from 2016 to 2022. Findings: The findings indicate that the replications of a conventional portfolio into an Islamic portfolio are compatible with the regulatory standard, sharia boundaries and professional practices developed from investment theory. The result shows that Islamic portfolios have lower risk exposure compared with their conventional counterparts in most of the sample years, therefore, become further attractive for debt–equity portfolio swaps and Sharia-compliant investors preferring low-risk preferences. The result confirmed that the Islamic portfolios have a higher return and less risk than conventional portfolios. Research limitations/implications: The implications of this research are to provide a road map to the regulators, policymakers, governments and the financial industry on how to rearrange some of the public and private debt. A likely remedy is incorporating Islamic financial instrument principles through the equitisation of public and private debt. Practical implications: This research contributes to investors (particularly those who want to avoid riba [usury] based investment) to make more diversified portfolios by considering Islamic portfolios to reduce risk exposure. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to create bivariate debt–equity portfolios swaps composed of Islamic and conventional assets. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
ABSTRACT
African Americans (AA) have higher incidence and mortality rates for several cancer types in comparison to their European American (EA) counterparts. Increasing participation in clinical research and patient registries, related to precision cancer medicine, will significantly improve cancer health equity. Many AA cancer patients are treated in community oncology clinics. Unfortunately, these health systems have limited access to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) next generation sequence (NGS) germline and somatic DNA and RNA testing that are used to inform oncologists on the best treatment and/or clinical trial options for cancer patients. Indeed, AA CLIA NGS sample sets are poorly represented, which could presumably result in incomplete knowledge of genomic variants that could affect their treatment and overall outcomes. Hence, it is crucial to implement CLIA NGS efforts for all cancer patients. To address these disparities, Morehouse School of Medicine has formed the Comprehensive Approach to Reimagine health Equity Solutions (CARhES) consortium with Tuskegee University that has engaged community oncology practices in Alabama and Georgia - two of five Black Belt states. The CARhES consortium aims to implement precision cancer medicine to underserved and underrepresented communities that will improve the standard of cancer care by providing access to CLIA NGS testing, clinical trials, and personalized cancer care. Here we describe the first proof of concept of this approach with community oncology partners, i.e., Grady Health System, Wellstar Health System, Georgia Urology, Midtown Urology, and Maui Memorial Medical Center. At the time of consent, saliva, buccal, and tumor samples were collected from participants. Germline and somatic CLIA NGS was performed, and medical reports were returned to practitioners within 14 days. Prior to the COVID pandemic, the study enrolled over 880 patients with a 88% consent rate (n = 1000) in the first 11months of the program. At the start of the COVID pandemic, recruitment efforts were suspended for four months with a slow restart by June 2020. A decrease in the number of staff, office visits (67% reduction), and increase in COVID cases significantly limited recruitment efforts. During this slowdown, we established and improved eConsenting capabilities, which exist today. Community anxiety, due to the pandemic and SARS-CoV-19 vaccine efforts, resulted in a significant reduction in consent rates (88% to 60%). Nevertheless, this study began in April of 2019 and consented 1,750 participants in less than 2 years. Taken together, our study shows that a community-focused precision medicine approach requires meeting people where they are and providing them with access and understanding the benefit of clinical trial participation. The approximate 2,000 clinically annotated genomic AA datasets will greatly contribute to our understanding of cancer health disparities and among the first steps to democratize precision medicine.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This conceptual paper aims to explore portfolio replication to resolve post-COVID pandemic private and public debt. This paper stresses the need to be less dependent on a debt-based system and the emergence Islamic equity market. Design/methodology/approach: This study analyses different types of risks involved in Islamic and conventional portfolios by using risk measures such as relative beta and comparatively examining the systematic and downside risk exposure of Islamic and conventional portfolios. Data was collected monthly from 2016 to 2022. Findings: The findings indicate that the replications of a conventional portfolio into an Islamic portfolio are compatible with the regulatory standard, sharia boundaries and professional practices developed from investment theory. The result shows that Islamic portfolios have lower risk exposure compared with their conventional counterparts in most of the sample years, therefore, become further attractive for debt–equity portfolio swaps and Sharia-compliant investors preferring low-risk preferences. The result confirmed that the Islamic portfolios have a higher return and less risk than conventional portfolios. Research limitations/implications: The implications of this research are to provide a road map to the regulators, policymakers, governments and the financial industry on how to rearrange some of the public and private debt. A likely remedy is incorporating Islamic financial instrument principles through the equitisation of public and private debt. Practical implications: This research contributes to investors (particularly those who want to avoid riba [usury] based investment) to make more diversified portfolios by considering Islamic portfolios to reduce risk exposure. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to create bivariate debt–equity portfolios swaps composed of Islamic and conventional assets. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
ABSTRACT
Drawing on expert contributions from around the UK, this collection brings together a series of insights into the contemporary local and community news media landscape in the UK. Offering an analysis of the ongoing ‘crisis’ in the provision of local news, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the book provides a critical space for practitioners and scholars to reflect on emerging models for economically sustainable, participatory local news services. It showcases new scholarly analyses of local news provision and community news practices, giving voice to the experiences of practitioners from across the local news ecology. In a set of diverse contributing chapters, campaigners and practitioners map out the period of recent rapid change for local news, questioning contemporary government initiatives and highlighting the advent of diverse, entrepreneurial reactions to the spaces created by a decline in local mainstream news services. This book is a timely examination of what we can learn from the variety of approaches being taken across the local media landscape in the commercial, subsidised and non-profit sector, shining new light on how practices that place the engagement of citizens at their centre might be propagated within this policy and funding landscape. Reappraising Local and Community News in the UK is a valuable resource for students and scholars interested in local news and journalism, as well as for anyone interested in the evolving local media landscape in the UK. TABLE OF CONTENTS. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, David Harte and Rachel Matthews individual chapters, the contributors.
ABSTRACT
Given the increasing application of cutback strategies in the workplace, and an underlying need to understand explanatory process at work, we investigated the effects of one cutback strategy to deal with economic uncertainty–furloughs. Equity theory and social exchange theory guided our predictions in explaining the mechanisms through which furloughs affect turnover intentions. Quantitative data collected at two time periods during the “Great Recession”, after cutbacks were announced and implemented, provided evidence that assessments of psychological contract breach and work overload affect the relationship between furlough experience and turnover intentions. To investigate how the additional stressors of a pandemic affected the proposed model, a follow-up content analysis of employee discussions around cutback policies during the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. This analysis provided support for the model, and also identifies several additional themes brought on by the pandemic (trust, and health and safety), with many employees exhibiting feelings of anxiety and fear around cutback policies and the status of their employment in general. Our results have implications for many organizational cutback initiatives, including salary reductions and decreased organizational resources, that are implemented during times of crisis. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.